UPDATE (12/19/2023): summary of findings below.
As mentioned in previous posts, it is possible in our four-dimensional space time R3+T for dual-spin point particles to exist. Rotations in either two or three dimensional space must lie within a plane, but in R3+T, it is possible to have two orthogonal planes, and point particles can have simultaneous independent spins lying in each of the two planes. This gets a lot more interesting in real life because interactions only lie within the three dimensional hypersurface slice of R3+T. This causes the spin traversal of point particles to pop in and out of (interactable) existence.
An important property of elementary point particles in R3+T is quantization. If one spin lies in both the T dimension direction and one of the three R3 dimensions, for example, this spin must be quantized to one complete rotation. We see this quantization in photons, where E=hv means that for any given wave frequency, there is only one allowable energy. This quantization maps geometrically to a single vector rotation, starting and stopping into the background state pointing in the T dimension direction (for this quantization to work, the background state has to be a lowest energy state for the particle rotation). I have several posts that elaborate on this, such as: https://wordpress.com/post/agemozphysics.com/1722
Combining these two principles, the point particle appears to observers living in our hypersurface as multiple independent point particles. For example, a dual-spin ratio of 3:1, a R3+T projection of a single point particle will appear as three point particles, and one of the three particles will exist in the hypersurface twice as long as the other two, see the figure:
The hypersurface immersion time is very important, because that is the only time that the R3+T point particle will interact with other particles and fields in the hypersurface (which is why I call our R3 existence within R3+T an “activation layer”). I did a comparison of this immersion time for the 1:3 point particle with the 1:1 point particle, and discovered that the two smaller point particles have half the immersion time as the larger 1:3 particle, and one quarter of the 1:1 immersion time.
A point particle that is heavier than another point particle means that it either has more mass, or spends less time in the activation layer (an inertial force has less average time to move the particle). Since dual-spin particles pop in and out of the activation layer, the immersion times will affect the observable mass of the particle as well as the observable charge force on the particle. My analysis shows that dual-spin point particles in R3+T should have immersion time ratios of 1x, 2x, and 4x for the 1:1 and 1:3 ratio cases. If dual-spin point particles are reality, there should be a set of spin ratios that result in the mass and charge ratios between electrons and quarks. Gluons could have something to do with the connections between the immersion times of the observable R3 particles, but that is speculation at this point.
UPDATE: The original post wasn’t clear on what these results mean: to summarize, I conclude that dual-spin point particles in R3+T appear to observers to project into multiple pseudo particles due to our existence within the R3 hypersurface activation layer. All particles have one of the quantized spins in (for example) the Z-T dimension plane, but massive particles also have an independent spin in the X-Y dimension plane. The ratio of spins affects the properties and the number of observed pseudo-particles in R3. This ratio causes the apparent mass to increase as the X-Y spin factor goes up because its immersion time decreases proportionately (making less time for the particle to be affected by forces and thus causing the particle to seem heavier).
However, charge is generated as a wave (quantum field theory of virtual photons), so charge is solely a function of the number of pseudo-particles, independent of their apparent mass, because a wave is induced when the Z+T spin passes through the activation layer hypersurface (the T dimension spin direction goes to 0). The number of pseudo-particles is determined by the X-Y spin factor relative to the Z-T spin factor.
When pseudo particles annihilate, the X-Y spin factor cancels out, leaving only the Z-T spin factor and these are massless (photons) since in this scenario both mass and charge are due to the dual-spin particle’s X-Y spin (see https://wordpress.com/post/agemozphysics.com/1722).
In other words, I am positing that dual-spin particles in R3+T form a basis for all of the particles we see in real life by altering the spin ratios in the particle. I will continue to investigate R3+T particle ratios to see if the families of elementary particles (for example, the lepton sets of 3) result.
To the best of my ability, I have so far been speaking the truth about dual-spin point particles and their properties. What I don’t have at this time is proof that these point particles map to real life particles, so the investigation continues. The “holy grail” of this study is to find that proof.
Agemoz
Tags: physics, quantum, quantum theory, special relativity, special-relativity
Agemoz's Physics Blog 
Leave a comment